You haven't countered anything, you just keep repeating yourself over and over.
Why the hell should I set you up with a lawyer? YOU made the claim, YOU do the research. You've done NO research, NONE. Since YOU brought up the topic, YOU are obligated to find the evidence, duh.
I repeat myself over and over. Funny, if I repeat myself over and over, how come each of my points are usually drasticly different sizes? Now you're going to hide behind the "you repeat yourself" act, just so you don't have to make any point at all. Pathetic.
I tell you what, though. I'll invite some users from chat, not all like me, to read over this if they are willing to, and we'll get some input there.
I'm still waiting for your 'points'....haven't seen one yet besides what you 'think' is a point....that men should be able to financially abort a kid. That's it.
You provide NO facts, NO studies, no nothing.
You have NO clue how the family court system works, you've NEVER talked to a lawyer (or the like), never interviewed people who know about the subject.
So, get on it. Make some informed claims and the get back to me. Quit repeating the same ignorant crap over and over again and try to act smart. Get a clue, get informed. I DARE you, but I know you're too afraid because you say you refuse to do it. Grow a set of balls and do it.
Still waiting for my points? I made a full list. Seventeen to be exact, and that was barely half of them. Took two comment boxes just to do seventeen, seventeen that I know you won't be able to counter without me countering your counter to prove your counter has no point against my original point. But, on the off chance you make any reasonable counters other than "they both had sex, they both are responsible" a very stupidly simple way to discuss something that can't be solved that fast.
WHat I have said doesn't need "facts", what I have said is "facts". Child benefits is my main point in all of this, do I need "facts" to show that's right? -Sigh-
My mother was a social worker, among other things, that helped lawyers help young adults and teens on pregnancy affairs. So ayes, I do know someone that is familar with the subject. So before you try to tell me of the experiences that have not happened in my life, just remember that I know my life more than some person online that doesn't even know me. You tell "me" to look for facts, yet you say that I have no experience with certain people that know of this subject, even when you could never know. Great way of practicing what you preach.
Jeez, did I repeat myself at all there, too?
But since I made a full list of points you avoided, I'm going to love how you "try" to counter them.
Like I said, you came to me, you started the debate, you introduced the suggestion of contacting a lawyer, you brought the tax payers part that is the main thing of why you brought the lawyer thing up, so you set it up. Afraid that you'll be laughed at for expecting people of the law to take two hours out of their time to debate this for two hours plus with no financial gain, and then youexpect me to phone up and ask them to do that? If you think they'd agree to such a thing, then you're a moron.
Wrong. I brought up the topic, not to you, to the poll. You came to me, so you are obliged to make the effort to prove me wrong due to you coming to me to say I'm wrong.
Don't worry, I'm making a list of things you haven't correctly countered. Might take a while due to reading them all, but I'm sure you'll avoid it.
Abortion: Against or For?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
You haven't countered anything, you just keep repeating yourself over and over.
Why the hell should I set you up with a lawyer? YOU made the claim, YOU do the research. You've done NO research, NONE. Since YOU brought up the topic, YOU are obligated to find the evidence, duh.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I repeat myself over and over. Funny, if I repeat myself over and over, how come each of my points are usually drasticly different sizes? Now you're going to hide behind the "you repeat yourself" act, just so you don't have to make any point at all. Pathetic.
I tell you what, though. I'll invite some users from chat, not all like me, to read over this if they are willing to, and we'll get some input there.
--
wigsplitz
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm still waiting for your 'points'....haven't seen one yet besides what you 'think' is a point....that men should be able to financially abort a kid. That's it.
You provide NO facts, NO studies, no nothing.
You have NO clue how the family court system works, you've NEVER talked to a lawyer (or the like), never interviewed people who know about the subject.
So, get on it. Make some informed claims and the get back to me. Quit repeating the same ignorant crap over and over again and try to act smart. Get a clue, get informed. I DARE you, but I know you're too afraid because you say you refuse to do it. Grow a set of balls and do it.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Still waiting for my points? I made a full list. Seventeen to be exact, and that was barely half of them. Took two comment boxes just to do seventeen, seventeen that I know you won't be able to counter without me countering your counter to prove your counter has no point against my original point. But, on the off chance you make any reasonable counters other than "they both had sex, they both are responsible" a very stupidly simple way to discuss something that can't be solved that fast.
WHat I have said doesn't need "facts", what I have said is "facts". Child benefits is my main point in all of this, do I need "facts" to show that's right? -Sigh-
My mother was a social worker, among other things, that helped lawyers help young adults and teens on pregnancy affairs. So ayes, I do know someone that is familar with the subject. So before you try to tell me of the experiences that have not happened in my life, just remember that I know my life more than some person online that doesn't even know me. You tell "me" to look for facts, yet you say that I have no experience with certain people that know of this subject, even when you could never know. Great way of practicing what you preach.
Jeez, did I repeat myself at all there, too?
But since I made a full list of points you avoided, I'm going to love how you "try" to counter them.
Like I said, you came to me, you started the debate, you introduced the suggestion of contacting a lawyer, you brought the tax payers part that is the main thing of why you brought the lawyer thing up, so you set it up. Afraid that you'll be laughed at for expecting people of the law to take two hours out of their time to debate this for two hours plus with no financial gain, and then youexpect me to phone up and ask them to do that? If you think they'd agree to such a thing, then you're a moron.
Wrong. I brought up the topic, not to you, to the poll. You came to me, so you are obliged to make the effort to prove me wrong due to you coming to me to say I'm wrong.
Don't worry, I'm making a list of things you haven't correctly countered. Might take a while due to reading them all, but I'm sure you'll avoid it.