AM I too afraid? Didn't you read the last part? You want me to talk to such people, and this debate with you has gone on for more than two hours. Do you really think any of those people are going to sit and take part of a two hour debate that gives them no financial profit? If you believe that they would, you should gather some new thoughts.
Like I said, I have no problem talking to them, and since you want it to happen, you can set it up. Contact a lawyer or judge etc, inform them of how long this debate has taken, then ask them to take part of it with no pay. If they agree to doing so, then I'll do it. By your same logic, if you say you're not going to, it's because you're "afraid to actually contact them".
Oh, so most people on here have no idea, do they? You do? Oh, I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, oh great Wigsplitz, but I don't think you understand, you can put your self on a high horse, but don't expect anyone else to see you sitting on it. Infact, expect me to pull you off it, kind of like I am now.
I'm nineteen. I have "no clue" yet I am countering all your points. Must be irritating, trying to make someones input seem stupid when they're completely dominating the debate.
Like I said. You want me to do it, so I will if you set it up. I like how you avoid that bit, the bit where I ask you to make it happen due to you wanting it to happen. See, it's not the actual debate that makes me think I'll makle a fool of myself, it's expectiing such busy people to take part in a two hour plus debate that started online...
Need what I said repeated? Like you do most of the time? Ok.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Something tells me you'll choose to ignore what I said here.
Anyway, on to countering your other points, if you can call them points. -Sigh-
YOu set it up, it's YOUR fight. I already know the outcome. You're the one who needs to see it for yourself.
You always do this....you make claims, pandering to mostly teenagers who don't know anything about the law or family court, or anything like that. YOU set it up.....it's YOUR issue. You want to fight for it, you have the burden of proof.
If you can find a group of lawyers, judges and other informed individuals in this matter, then I will concede and deem you the king of the issue.
I'm not ignoring anything you say. I read it all, I get your 'point', OK? All I'm asking you for is some VALID, legal opinions on the matter. Otherwise it's just a bunch of shit. So, PROVE it's a good idea that should be considered. I'll be waiting.
I read all your replies, which are nothing but repetition after repetition, taking NO consideration to what a few intelligent people have pointed things out to you.
You keep on making yourself look like a fool making these dumb arguements that will NEVER happen and sound ridiculous, that's on you. Many people on here are trying to help you see how dumb it all sounds.
I didn't start this, you did. Go back and see who made the first posts about this idiotic idea. It was you. And youu KEEP bringing it up. Get over it, it's a LOST CAUSE. You're just making yuorself look more and more ignorant.
But, hey, at least you won't have to worry about it because no woman would ever have sex with you if you actually act like this.
It's listening skills I lack? How so? You came to me, that means you are the person that started the debate. I made a statement, you tried to challenge the statement, making it in to a debate. So it's you that lacks listening skills here.
Oh really? Well, I do recall giving you seventeen points in which you asked for in which you haven't countered or acknowledged yet, and yet you say I'm repeating things? Oh the cry of someone that can't accept defeat ina debate.
What a few intelligent people have pointed out to me? You consider yourself one of those people, right? Yet you sit there replying to me on side points, all while avoiding to answer the main points you asked for.
Read carefully, Wigsplitz. "Prove what I said to be wrong before saying they are" all I see is you claiming I'm wrong, yet not once have you made any points I can't counter, and then when I write down all the points you say you will counter after me telling you you've avoided main points, you decide not to reply to those points at all. My point is so ridiculous, yet you can't counter them.
Many people? You mean Mando and PumpkinKate? People that have gone out of their way in the past just to dissagree on everything I say, even when the majority and most intelligent, such as Dappled and DannyKanes, agree with on the same subjects Mando and PumpkinKate dissagree with me on?
The only way for me to accept I'm wrong, is for someone to prove me wrong, and you have done nothing to prove me wrong.
Erm, I made a statement, not spark a debate. It taked two to have a debate, and when I commented, I commented to make a statement. If some random person comes along and challenged the statement that was not put there for a debate starter, then it's the person that first engaged with the other peson that is responsible for the debate starting. A debate can only happen when a second persom involves themself, I didn't ask you to reply to me, you done it yourself, thus changing my statement in to a debate. Ergo, you started this debate.
No woman will have sex with me?...Oh the sad, irony behind that. I have turned down many "sex offers" as you can call them. I am very easily able to have sex, that even actual prostitutes offer free sex to me. For someone that claims I can't get sex, you sure don't know anything in which you talk about. But, I'll counter that with some logic rather than my own experienced offers. One night stands.
But, I still wait for your reply to the post of points you have yet to counter, or do you plan to avoid them due to you knowing you can't answer them without proving I won this debate?
Here, I'll repeat it to you.
Reply to the part you said you'd reply on of the parts I replied to you stating you having made any counter points.
Reply to the part you said you'd reply on of the parts I replied to you stating you having made any counter points.
Reply to the part you said you'd reply on of the parts I replied to you stating you having made any counter points.
Reply to the part you said you'd reply on of the parts I replied to you stating you having made any counter points.
You have no excuse not to answer them now. The fact that I already won this debate shows in the fact that you'll reply to every point that has nothing to do with the debate, yet will do anything to avoid replying to the points I made, that you said you'd reply to.
I gave you a list, all you have to do is answer them without me being able to counter your counter points in order to win this debate, yet even knowing that, you'll avoid answering them due to knowing you can't answer them.
In your mind you win, because you DON'T LISTEN!! You never listen to anyone who opposes you. You have problems.
Even if you had a GOOD idea, the way you treat people and your attitude will ALWAYS make you a failure. You HAVE to listen to others in order to grow,, and improve.
If someone tells you your product sucks and needs a new thingamajig to make it better, you're the type who will ignore them and go off on a rant....and be a complete failure because you don't know how to listen.
You can't even discern when a person is trying to help you vs just arguing with you or being mean. Not at all. I've seen people try to help you and you take it as a threat. You are insecure and how the hell are you going to get by in life? Hold a job? Not likely/. More likely you'll be in prison, where thankfully you can't reproduce. Although you'll likely get ass-raped based on your looks. Have fun with that.
Oh my God. Welldone. No, really. Well done. You are the first person to make me laugh on here. "You" asked me to present these points by list, I presented them in a list, you avoided answering them all together, the questions in which I said you ignored or couldn't answer, and what was the result? Even when I listed only half of them for you, you ignored and couldn't answer them. Your excuse? "I'm not answering because they're retarded". Good counter point, genius.
I never listen to anyone who opposes me? Wrong. I have been proven wrong many times, and when I am, I admit to it. I even apologize.
The way "I" treat people? Give me a minute, and I'll show you what your first reply to my point here was.
"Face it, your idea sucks and it would NEVER come to pass. Thankfully our lawmakers have the intelligence to not even entertain this ludicrous.
I told you to talk to a lawyer, I guess you haven't yet. No balls? Come on, grow a set and let a pro tell you where the bear shits in the woods. What a joke."
You expect me to just sit back and allow you to insult me? Sorry. Now you know fine well, that if you bite me in the ass, I'm going to bite you in the ass 10X harder.
You have to listen to others in order to improve and grow? Funny, coming from the person that said people that said you were wrong are idiots. Funny, how I listed all the main points, and yet you make excuses to answer them such as "They're retarded, that's why I didn't read them."
My attitude may be my failure, but your logic is your failure. How you think "It's too retarded to answer" is a good counter point against two full comment boxes, in which you asked for.
Wrong. If I had a product that "sucks" and it was entirely my fault, I would accept it. The irony of this whole thing is, I have actually been in such a situation in which I was selling a TV. I never explained the fuctions of the TVm as in what features it had added on to it, and they thought it had certain features, they returned it two days later regardless of not asking themselves if the TV had the features they were specificly looking for, and I returned their money due to understanding it wasn't the "product" they were looking for.
You're the type that would be terrible as any sort of law enfourcer/lawyer, etc. You are the type of person that would fail by thinking "It's retarded, that's why I didn't answer them" is a good reason to say someone is wrong, yet completely oblivious to understanding that you'd have to explain why they are "retarded".
Shut up, will you? Even if that was the case, which it clearly isn't, you are notone of those people. You have done nothing but insult me half the time. So if your idea of "helping" someone is insulting them, then for the love of God, add therapist to the list of things you would be terrible as.
I'm insecure? How so? By proving my point and asking you straight forward to counter my points, and then say you're a moron when you use the excuse "I'm not answering because your points are retarded? Oh please.
How am I going to get by in life? Well if your way of thinking beating something is to just say it's retarded with no explanation on how it's retarded and can get by in life, then I'm pretty damn sure I'll get by.
I'll be in prison? Maybe. Want to know a secret? I'm very good at avoiding that outcome.
"I'll get ass raped?". Second secret, but I'll give a little more information on this one. My uncle (found to be a pedophile/rapist) attempted to do that, believe me when I tell you that he didn't get far, and ended up being a victim by the end of that situation.
I can adapt. If it was the case that I risked being raped, I woud lessen the feminie featues of my appearance, which can be easily done by holding facial expressions that take little to no effort to keep doing.
So, tell me, Wigsplitz. Do you actually intend to keep replying to parts of the debate that have nothing to do with the actual debate, such as rape in prison, or are you actually going to get back on point and actually attempt to counter the actual parts in the debate?
The majority of what you have said on this page has nothing to do with the debate, just you "trying" to insult me, and saying I don'tlisten, in which if I didn't listen, then the majority of what I sadi wouldn't be in context with the points you attempt to make...But wait, they all are.
If anyone can prove me wrong on this subject, it will never be you. Somebody thinking "It's too retarded to answer" is a good way to counter points in any debate is incapable of winning a debate.
Abortion: Against or For?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
AM I too afraid? Didn't you read the last part? You want me to talk to such people, and this debate with you has gone on for more than two hours. Do you really think any of those people are going to sit and take part of a two hour debate that gives them no financial profit? If you believe that they would, you should gather some new thoughts.
Like I said, I have no problem talking to them, and since you want it to happen, you can set it up. Contact a lawyer or judge etc, inform them of how long this debate has taken, then ask them to take part of it with no pay. If they agree to doing so, then I'll do it. By your same logic, if you say you're not going to, it's because you're "afraid to actually contact them".
Oh, so most people on here have no idea, do they? You do? Oh, I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, oh great Wigsplitz, but I don't think you understand, you can put your self on a high horse, but don't expect anyone else to see you sitting on it. Infact, expect me to pull you off it, kind of like I am now.
I'm nineteen. I have "no clue" yet I am countering all your points. Must be irritating, trying to make someones input seem stupid when they're completely dominating the debate.
Like I said. You want me to do it, so I will if you set it up. I like how you avoid that bit, the bit where I ask you to make it happen due to you wanting it to happen. See, it's not the actual debate that makes me think I'll makle a fool of myself, it's expectiing such busy people to take part in a two hour plus debate that started online...
Need what I said repeated? Like you do most of the time? Ok.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Set it up for me since you want it to happen, and I'll talk to a lawyer or judge.
Something tells me you'll choose to ignore what I said here.
Anyway, on to countering your other points, if you can call them points. -Sigh-
--
wigsplitz
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
YOu set it up, it's YOUR fight. I already know the outcome. You're the one who needs to see it for yourself.
You always do this....you make claims, pandering to mostly teenagers who don't know anything about the law or family court, or anything like that. YOU set it up.....it's YOUR issue. You want to fight for it, you have the burden of proof.
If you can find a group of lawyers, judges and other informed individuals in this matter, then I will concede and deem you the king of the issue.
I'm not ignoring anything you say. I read it all, I get your 'point', OK? All I'm asking you for is some VALID, legal opinions on the matter. Otherwise it's just a bunch of shit. So, PROVE it's a good idea that should be considered. I'll be waiting.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's my fight? I never started it, you did. You replied to me, you came to me with the suggestion, so it is for you to make it happen.
I know you read all my points, it's making counter points you lack.
--
wigsplitz
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No, it's listening skills YOU lack.
I read all your replies, which are nothing but repetition after repetition, taking NO consideration to what a few intelligent people have pointed things out to you.
You keep on making yourself look like a fool making these dumb arguements that will NEVER happen and sound ridiculous, that's on you. Many people on here are trying to help you see how dumb it all sounds.
I didn't start this, you did. Go back and see who made the first posts about this idiotic idea. It was you. And youu KEEP bringing it up. Get over it, it's a LOST CAUSE. You're just making yuorself look more and more ignorant.
But, hey, at least you won't have to worry about it because no woman would ever have sex with you if you actually act like this.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's listening skills I lack? How so? You came to me, that means you are the person that started the debate. I made a statement, you tried to challenge the statement, making it in to a debate. So it's you that lacks listening skills here.
Oh really? Well, I do recall giving you seventeen points in which you asked for in which you haven't countered or acknowledged yet, and yet you say I'm repeating things? Oh the cry of someone that can't accept defeat ina debate.
What a few intelligent people have pointed out to me? You consider yourself one of those people, right? Yet you sit there replying to me on side points, all while avoiding to answer the main points you asked for.
Read carefully, Wigsplitz. "Prove what I said to be wrong before saying they are" all I see is you claiming I'm wrong, yet not once have you made any points I can't counter, and then when I write down all the points you say you will counter after me telling you you've avoided main points, you decide not to reply to those points at all. My point is so ridiculous, yet you can't counter them.
Many people? You mean Mando and PumpkinKate? People that have gone out of their way in the past just to dissagree on everything I say, even when the majority and most intelligent, such as Dappled and DannyKanes, agree with on the same subjects Mando and PumpkinKate dissagree with me on?
The only way for me to accept I'm wrong, is for someone to prove me wrong, and you have done nothing to prove me wrong.
Erm, I made a statement, not spark a debate. It taked two to have a debate, and when I commented, I commented to make a statement. If some random person comes along and challenged the statement that was not put there for a debate starter, then it's the person that first engaged with the other peson that is responsible for the debate starting. A debate can only happen when a second persom involves themself, I didn't ask you to reply to me, you done it yourself, thus changing my statement in to a debate. Ergo, you started this debate.
No woman will have sex with me?...Oh the sad, irony behind that. I have turned down many "sex offers" as you can call them. I am very easily able to have sex, that even actual prostitutes offer free sex to me. For someone that claims I can't get sex, you sure don't know anything in which you talk about. But, I'll counter that with some logic rather than my own experienced offers. One night stands.
But, I still wait for your reply to the post of points you have yet to counter, or do you plan to avoid them due to you knowing you can't answer them without proving I won this debate?
Here, I'll repeat it to you.
Reply to the part you said you'd reply on of the parts I replied to you stating you having made any counter points.
Reply to the part you said you'd reply on of the parts I replied to you stating you having made any counter points.
Reply to the part you said you'd reply on of the parts I replied to you stating you having made any counter points.
Reply to the part you said you'd reply on of the parts I replied to you stating you having made any counter points.
You have no excuse not to answer them now. The fact that I already won this debate shows in the fact that you'll reply to every point that has nothing to do with the debate, yet will do anything to avoid replying to the points I made, that you said you'd reply to.
I gave you a list, all you have to do is answer them without me being able to counter your counter points in order to win this debate, yet even knowing that, you'll avoid answering them due to knowing you can't answer them.
Like I said, I win.
--
wigsplitz
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
In your mind you win, because you DON'T LISTEN!! You never listen to anyone who opposes you. You have problems.
Even if you had a GOOD idea, the way you treat people and your attitude will ALWAYS make you a failure. You HAVE to listen to others in order to grow,, and improve.
If someone tells you your product sucks and needs a new thingamajig to make it better, you're the type who will ignore them and go off on a rant....and be a complete failure because you don't know how to listen.
You can't even discern when a person is trying to help you vs just arguing with you or being mean. Not at all. I've seen people try to help you and you take it as a threat. You are insecure and how the hell are you going to get by in life? Hold a job? Not likely/. More likely you'll be in prison, where thankfully you can't reproduce. Although you'll likely get ass-raped based on your looks. Have fun with that.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Oh my God. Welldone. No, really. Well done. You are the first person to make me laugh on here. "You" asked me to present these points by list, I presented them in a list, you avoided answering them all together, the questions in which I said you ignored or couldn't answer, and what was the result? Even when I listed only half of them for you, you ignored and couldn't answer them. Your excuse? "I'm not answering because they're retarded". Good counter point, genius.
I never listen to anyone who opposes me? Wrong. I have been proven wrong many times, and when I am, I admit to it. I even apologize.
The way "I" treat people? Give me a minute, and I'll show you what your first reply to my point here was.
"Face it, your idea sucks and it would NEVER come to pass. Thankfully our lawmakers have the intelligence to not even entertain this ludicrous.
I told you to talk to a lawyer, I guess you haven't yet. No balls? Come on, grow a set and let a pro tell you where the bear shits in the woods. What a joke."
You expect me to just sit back and allow you to insult me? Sorry. Now you know fine well, that if you bite me in the ass, I'm going to bite you in the ass 10X harder.
You have to listen to others in order to improve and grow? Funny, coming from the person that said people that said you were wrong are idiots. Funny, how I listed all the main points, and yet you make excuses to answer them such as "They're retarded, that's why I didn't read them."
My attitude may be my failure, but your logic is your failure. How you think "It's too retarded to answer" is a good counter point against two full comment boxes, in which you asked for.
Wrong. If I had a product that "sucks" and it was entirely my fault, I would accept it. The irony of this whole thing is, I have actually been in such a situation in which I was selling a TV. I never explained the fuctions of the TVm as in what features it had added on to it, and they thought it had certain features, they returned it two days later regardless of not asking themselves if the TV had the features they were specificly looking for, and I returned their money due to understanding it wasn't the "product" they were looking for.
You're the type that would be terrible as any sort of law enfourcer/lawyer, etc. You are the type of person that would fail by thinking "It's retarded, that's why I didn't answer them" is a good reason to say someone is wrong, yet completely oblivious to understanding that you'd have to explain why they are "retarded".
Shut up, will you? Even if that was the case, which it clearly isn't, you are notone of those people. You have done nothing but insult me half the time. So if your idea of "helping" someone is insulting them, then for the love of God, add therapist to the list of things you would be terrible as.
I'm insecure? How so? By proving my point and asking you straight forward to counter my points, and then say you're a moron when you use the excuse "I'm not answering because your points are retarded? Oh please.
How am I going to get by in life? Well if your way of thinking beating something is to just say it's retarded with no explanation on how it's retarded and can get by in life, then I'm pretty damn sure I'll get by.
I'll be in prison? Maybe. Want to know a secret? I'm very good at avoiding that outcome.
"I'll get ass raped?". Second secret, but I'll give a little more information on this one. My uncle (found to be a pedophile/rapist) attempted to do that, believe me when I tell you that he didn't get far, and ended up being a victim by the end of that situation.
I can adapt. If it was the case that I risked being raped, I woud lessen the feminie featues of my appearance, which can be easily done by holding facial expressions that take little to no effort to keep doing.
So, tell me, Wigsplitz. Do you actually intend to keep replying to parts of the debate that have nothing to do with the actual debate, such as rape in prison, or are you actually going to get back on point and actually attempt to counter the actual parts in the debate?
The majority of what you have said on this page has nothing to do with the debate, just you "trying" to insult me, and saying I don'tlisten, in which if I didn't listen, then the majority of what I sadi wouldn't be in context with the points you attempt to make...But wait, they all are.
If anyone can prove me wrong on this subject, it will never be you. Somebody thinking "It's too retarded to answer" is a good way to counter points in any debate is incapable of winning a debate.