You didn't need to be racist and rude when you didn't want to go out with him. What's wrong with a polite "No thanks"? If he comes back and heavies you, tell your manager, but I doubt very much if he'd want to date you now anyway.
A choice based on race is racist? Ok then. Donating blood to people of a specific ethnic background can be done in many cases specifically from people with close ethnicity. That's why they look for donors of colour.
Given your belief, this is racist and must be shut down, which puts their survival at great risk.
Making a choice based on race is also essential in marketing, where they frequently use people of various racial backgrounds to match the colours of the products, thus amplifying the impact and stimulating our senses. We call this capitalism and it saved tons of lives.
https://goo.gl/images/kkv5BT
According to you, this is also racist and must be shut down.
Biracial marriages face higher risks of congenital malformations, premature birth and stillbirth, have less chances of finding donors for their children if required and the background can have stronger negative impact on kids' health. These are some risks that people can choose to take or not to take. If they already face health problems, a biracial offspring can boost the problems even more in their family. People have the right to choose if they want or not to face such risks. We call this, freedom and it came with democracy.
According to you, this is bad and must be prevented. In the modern history, fascism is what made this happen effectively.
This is why you are brainwashed. Because you don't understand that people have liberties and rights to speak, to think, to act. And they can choose to do so from a range of options, including race and ethnicity. Restricting this range to YOUR preferred options is contradicting the notion of freedom and you are brainwashed because you try to restrict our freedoms while believing that you go towards a progressive direction. And you are weak because you buy low-quality content from the society and reinforce it on people without judging first. That's what weak people do. There is no such thing as freedom of speech, but don't say what I dislike to hear, freedom of choice, but don't make it based on race, freedom of act, but don't act against my interest. That must answer your question.
it is not in the same context. of course you need people who are compatible to help with certain medical problems for people, but making a conscious thought against someone because they are this ethnic group or that color is actually racist. of course, not that the author should have said it, but people have preferences of who they are attracted to and it does not mean that they are really racist in my opinion.
Did I say OP should be forced to go out with someone she doesn't want to? Settle down, I was just exercising my freedom of speech to express my opinion.
You said she should stop rejecting men based on race because that's racist. And your opinion of racism is totally nonsensical. She has the right to reject an indian based on his skin colour any time she wants and it's none of your business. White women dating dark dudes is disgusting as well because they have lower IQ and increased violence in behaviour and she made her choice of staying away from such perils. You are not entitled to tell her anything about her choices. Her choice can be based on race and nationality and you have no right to tell her that she shouldn't do so. Furthermore, instead of defending women who are at risk because of these menaces to society, your first thought is that people shouldn't be racist. This only proves once again how ignorant and weak and pathetic you are, failing to defend innocent people. A bastardized nation is facing collapse and America is living it as we speak, with the white population becoming a minority in several cities and not only. White people, think again of what you do.
i cannot remember the author saying that they did not want to go out with the man because he was darked skin which may mean that he is violent. not only is that not true in the first place it is wrong to say that the author was saying that. please be careful about what you say. your post is offensive even to me who is very pale right now at one fourty five in the morning.
Ha, thought you'd eventually reveal your true colours (excuse the use of that word). Oh and some more personal abuse: that's a good argument on your part.
Oh well, I guess like a lot of racist bigots you believe you're not weak or ignorant or pathetic, but I beg to differ.
I think that if the usa (America includes a lot more countries than the us) is facing collapse it will be for many other reasons than "bastardization". Are you a leftover from the Civil War, Nazi Germany or just a throwback?
A customer tried to force me to go on a date with him
← View full post
You didn't need to be racist and rude when you didn't want to go out with him. What's wrong with a polite "No thanks"? If he comes back and heavies you, tell your manager, but I doubt very much if he'd want to date you now anyway.
--
WarriorGene
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Racist? What the hell does a personal choice have to do with racism? You are hopelessly weak and brainwashed.
--
Ellenna
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I believe a choice based on race is racist and I'm not hopelessly weak or brainwashed, where did you get that idea? Just because we disgree?
--
WarriorGene
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
A choice based on race is racist? Ok then. Donating blood to people of a specific ethnic background can be done in many cases specifically from people with close ethnicity. That's why they look for donors of colour.
"https://www.blood.co.uk/why-give-blood/the-need-for-blood/black-asian-and-minority-ethnic-communities/"
Given your belief, this is racist and must be shut down, which puts their survival at great risk.
Making a choice based on race is also essential in marketing, where they frequently use people of various racial backgrounds to match the colours of the products, thus amplifying the impact and stimulating our senses. We call this capitalism and it saved tons of lives.
https://goo.gl/images/kkv5BT
According to you, this is also racist and must be shut down.
Biracial marriages face higher risks of congenital malformations, premature birth and stillbirth, have less chances of finding donors for their children if required and the background can have stronger negative impact on kids' health. These are some risks that people can choose to take or not to take. If they already face health problems, a biracial offspring can boost the problems even more in their family. People have the right to choose if they want or not to face such risks. We call this, freedom and it came with democracy.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/
According to you, this is bad and must be prevented. In the modern history, fascism is what made this happen effectively.
This is why you are brainwashed. Because you don't understand that people have liberties and rights to speak, to think, to act. And they can choose to do so from a range of options, including race and ethnicity. Restricting this range to YOUR preferred options is contradicting the notion of freedom and you are brainwashed because you try to restrict our freedoms while believing that you go towards a progressive direction. And you are weak because you buy low-quality content from the society and reinforce it on people without judging first. That's what weak people do. There is no such thing as freedom of speech, but don't say what I dislike to hear, freedom of choice, but don't make it based on race, freedom of act, but don't act against my interest. That must answer your question.
--
sissycakes
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Ellenna
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
it is not in the same context. of course you need people who are compatible to help with certain medical problems for people, but making a conscious thought against someone because they are this ethnic group or that color is actually racist. of course, not that the author should have said it, but people have preferences of who they are attracted to and it does not mean that they are really racist in my opinion.
Did I say OP should be forced to go out with someone she doesn't want to? Settle down, I was just exercising my freedom of speech to express my opinion.
--
WarriorGene
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You said she should stop rejecting men based on race because that's racist. And your opinion of racism is totally nonsensical. She has the right to reject an indian based on his skin colour any time she wants and it's none of your business. White women dating dark dudes is disgusting as well because they have lower IQ and increased violence in behaviour and she made her choice of staying away from such perils. You are not entitled to tell her anything about her choices. Her choice can be based on race and nationality and you have no right to tell her that she shouldn't do so. Furthermore, instead of defending women who are at risk because of these menaces to society, your first thought is that people shouldn't be racist. This only proves once again how ignorant and weak and pathetic you are, failing to defend innocent people. A bastardized nation is facing collapse and America is living it as we speak, with the white population becoming a minority in several cities and not only. White people, think again of what you do.
--
sissycakes
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Ellenna
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
i cannot remember the author saying that they did not want to go out with the man because he was darked skin which may mean that he is violent. not only is that not true in the first place it is wrong to say that the author was saying that. please be careful about what you say. your post is offensive even to me who is very pale right now at one fourty five in the morning.
Ha, thought you'd eventually reveal your true colours (excuse the use of that word). Oh and some more personal abuse: that's a good argument on your part.
Oh well, I guess like a lot of racist bigots you believe you're not weak or ignorant or pathetic, but I beg to differ.
I think that if the usa (America includes a lot more countries than the us) is facing collapse it will be for many other reasons than "bastardization". Are you a leftover from the Civil War, Nazi Germany or just a throwback?