I'd save the 17 year old. No offence to the baby, but they haven't really had the chance to form their personality and mind fully, so, as bad as it sounds, I don't really see it as as much of a loss, as the 17 year old and the 10 year old. The 10 year old is tempting, but I think the 10 year old is at the point in life, where it could really screw them up permanently. The 17 year old would be traumatized, but I could see them getting past it with grief counseling a lot more easily than the 10 year old. By 17, you already have a better feel that death is a fact of life and an inevitability.
Who would you save?
← View full post
I'd save the 17 year old. No offence to the baby, but they haven't really had the chance to form their personality and mind fully, so, as bad as it sounds, I don't really see it as as much of a loss, as the 17 year old and the 10 year old. The 10 year old is tempting, but I think the 10 year old is at the point in life, where it could really screw them up permanently. The 17 year old would be traumatized, but I could see them getting past it with grief counseling a lot more easily than the 10 year old. By 17, you already have a better feel that death is a fact of life and an inevitability.